Now that the manufacturing market is picking back up, the idea of developing production capacity is probably on the minds of many manufacturers. Certainly, when demand is strong, companies have a big incentive to add equipment or expand facilities in order to keep up. But even when demand is slowly increasing, manufacturers need to find a way to keep costs low and efficiently increase production capacity.
Having the ability to quickly turn around accurate orders can mean the difference between success and failure in this improving economy. The ability to carefully control labor costs is also an important consideration. Companies who have streamlined their production data flow through Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) will have lower downtime and will be able to promise (and deliver) their goods faster.
How can CIM help?
A CIM system such as Eclipse Production Management Software can directly improve production capacity by eliminating the downtime otherwise needed for data entry of orders and manual recording of production and coil usage. We have seen cases where the machine operator wastes sometimes as much as 100 minutes in a shift manually programming order data and punch patterns. Not surprisingly, these are always the first machines that need overtime or additional shifts when demand increases.
In an integrated system, no time is wasted entering cut-lists, programming punch patterns, changing messages on part printers, configuring automated stacking equipment, updating completion reports or recording footages for coil consumption. While each of these tasks may only require a few seconds or minutes at a time, the extra production capacity gained by eliminating them can add up quickly.
The information provided by CIM can also be a big help in reducing downtime and increasing production. In order to make improvements, managers need information about the best place to direct their time and budgets. The following are typical questions:
- How are my operators performing? Who is the best and why? For operators that are lagging behind, what areas should we focus on?
- How efficient are our production schedules? Are we doing needless changeovers because of poor planning?
- Outside of the roll formers, how is the rest of our system performing? Are the mills ever delayed waiting for coils to be delivered or for bundles to be taken away?
- What are the most common unplanned maintenance downtimes? How often do they occur and for how long? Do they ever impact our delivery promises?
- What are the bottlenecks on the machines that are currently limiting throughput? If we could eliminate these constraints, how much extra production would be gained?
- How can we justify upgrades to existing equipment?
- When buying new machinery, what features or specifications are the best fit for our production needs? Can we justify higher levels of automation?
- Are our machines capable of producing at the specified tolerances? If not, we will waste a lot of time and material.
Example
The purpose of this example is to show how seemingly small improvements can add up to dramatic increases in capacity.
The example is based on a fairly typical machine which processes an average of 15 orders during shift 1. Each order typically has around 10 items. The machine has an ink-jet printer that is marking each part. Some of the information in the print message must be changed per order.
Data Entry Savings
Before implementing Eclipse, the operator spent an average of 9.7 seconds per line item for data entry at the machine controller. He also spent around 45 seconds changing information on the ink-jet printer per order. With Eclipse in place, all job data was downloaded to the XL200 Series controller. Since the XL200 was integrated with the printer, the operator no longer had to waste time (and risk mistakes) with print message data entry. The resulting downtime reduction can be calculated as follows:
Item data entry: 15 orders * 10 items * 9.7 sec. = 1455 sec. = 24.25 minutes
Printer data entry: 15 orders * 45 sec. = 675 sec. = 11.25 minutes
Total downtime directly saved by integration (per shift): 35.5 minutes
Coil Change Procedure Savings
By reviewing the Pareto chart in Eclipse’s downtime summary report, management was able to see that coil changes were responsible for more than a third of the total downtime. There were 7 hours (420 minutes) of scheduled production time per shift (after subtracting break times). The machine ran for an average of 118 minutes (28%) leaving 302 minutes of downtime. There was an average of 12 coil changes per shift.
Management also noticed that while the average coil change time was 9.3 minutes, one operator was able to consistently perform a coil change in 7.8 minutes or less. By simple observation, it became apparent that this operator was faster because of the way he prepared for the changeover (while the machine was still running). By adopting this technique as a standard, the company was able to get the average coil change time down to 8.1 minutes. This lead to another reduction in wasted downtime:
Previous coil change time per shift: 12 changes * 9.3 minutes = 111.6 minutes
Improved coil change time per shift: 12 changes * 8.1 minutes = 97.2 minutes
Downtime saved by improved coil change process (per shift): 14.4 minutes
Uncoiler Upgrade Savings
Even with this reduction in coil change times, it was still the largest downtime cause and was a natural target for capital budgeting. To go from a single-mandrel un-coiler to a dual unit would have a big impact on the changeover time since it would shift much of the process from internal time (requiring the machine to be stopped) to external time (while the machine is running). For a change, the operator only needs to cut off the material before the roll former and rewind, then spin the un-coiler around and thread-up the new coil. The old coil can then be removed and the next one staged while the machine is running. This should reduce the average coil change time to 5 minutes or less (additional 37.2 minute downtime reduction).
Previous coil change time per shift: 12 changes * 8.1 minutes = 97.2 minutes
Improved coil change time per shift: 12 changes * 5.0 minutes = 60.0 minutes
Downtime saved by improved coil change process (per shift): 37.2 minutes
The Need for Speed?
Although the improvements only shaved off a few minutes here and there, the total reduction in wasted time was dramatic:
Downtime directly saved by integration (per shift): 35.5 minutes
Downtime saved by improved coil change process (per shift): 14.4 minutes
Downtime saved by improved coil change process (per shift): 37.2 minutes
Total Downtime reduction (per shift): 87.1 minutes
How good is 87 minutes of reduced downtime? A good analogy is a driving trip: the distance traveled is like production output, speed is speed and pit stops are downtime. Consider two cars leaving at the same time and driving to the same destination far away. The first car has two adults and the second has one adult and three small children. If both cars are to arrive at the destination at the same time, how much faster must the second car drive to make up for the frequent and sometimes lengthy toilet breaks? Thankfully, there are speed limits in most parts of the world. With roll forming, the exact same calculation can be made and equipment cost serves as the speed limit.
After the improvements, the machine is able to go from 118 minutes to 205 minutes of production time. A machine running 215 fpm (66 mpm) would need to be upgraded to run at 370 fpm (113 mpm) to get the same increase in output. As with the driving example, while this machine speed increase may be possible, it is probably not a practical solution.
Financial Considerations
What does 87 minutes of additional production capacity look like in financial terms? As with many things, the answer depends on the circumstances. If you are unable to keep up with your customer’s demand for your products, 87 minutes a shift equates to a large sack of money! Consider the following example:
Average machine speed: 215 fpm (66 mpm)
Increased run time/shift: 87 minutes
Additional product/shift: 18,705 feet (5701 m)
Lineal gross margin: $0.60/foot ($1.96/m)
Incremental revenue/shift $11,223
This is an extreme case. Customers who have this kind of demand quickly attract competitors and the situation would probably not continue. If you are able to win jobs because of your increased responsiveness, however, the additional margin from this work should be considered. Aside from this margin, increased production capacity should allow you to delay or eliminate the need to go to overtime or additional shifts.
Conclusions
If you are not already using a CIM system such as Eclipse, it is well worth considering. For a relatively small investment you can directly improve your production capacity, responsiveness to customer requests, and competitive position in your market.
The information provided by Eclipse helps to amplify the effects of your company’s management and improvement projects. It also gives great insights into what is really happening on your plant floor. Now is the time to position your company to succeed.
-
-
- A Case for Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)
- Basic Methods of Length Control
- Benefits of Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) - Deutsch
- Coil Handling
- Continuous Improvement - Tube & Pipe Journal
- Continuous Improvement in Roll Forming
- Encoder Tracking and Mounting
- Improving Roll Forming Operations
- Part Marking
- Roll Forming and Industry 4.0
- Roll Forming: The Four Basic Machine Types
- Servo Control for Improving Roll Formed Production
-
-
-
- Battery Replacement
- Calibrating the Touchscreen of an XL200 Controller
- Extending XL200 Controls with PLC Integration
- Solving Memory Loss and Computer Lockup Problems
- Using Product Codes for Machine Positioning in the XL200 Series Controller
- Using Setup Configurations in the XL200 Series Controller
- Using Tool Configurations in the XL200 Series Controller
- XL200 Direct Ethernet Communication with Eclipse
-
- Bar Code Scanners
- Bar Code Scanners for Data Entry
- Boosted Dies
- Calculating Press Reaction
- Checking Press Consistency with Oscilloscopes
- DIP Switch Configuration
- Punch Programming on the XL200
- Sending Saved Parameters or Tool Libraries from Eclipse to XL Controller
- Understanding the XL200 Part Queue
- Using Product Codes for Machine Positioning in the XL200 Series Controller
- Using Setup Configurations in the XL200 Series Controller
- Using Tool Configurations in the XL200 Series Controller
- XL200 Error Codes
- XL200 Parameters
-
- BOSS Shear
- Brake & Hump - XL200CLU
- Calculating Press Reaction
- Checking Press Consistency with Oscilloscopes
- Closed Loop Flying Die / Die Accelerator
- Closed Loop Stopping
- Coil End Point
- Extending XL200 Controls with PLC Integration
- Open Loop Flying Die
- Open Loop Stopping / Feed-to-Stop
- Tailout Sensor
-
-
- A Case for Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)
- Benefits of Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) - Deutsch
- Coil Inventory Management with CIM
- Improving Production Capacity with Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)
- Mistakes Happen! CIM for Mistake Prevention in Roll Forming
- Roll Forming and Industry 4.0
- The Quality Gap
-
- Automatically Starting Eclipse Classic
- Cable Specifications for RS Communication
- Coil Validation
- Creating an Eclipse Classic Package File
- Deleting Done Orders in Eclipse
- Eclipse - Windows Compatibility
- Eclipse Connections
- Eclipse Data Exchange Options
- Eclipse Permissions - XLSecurity.exe
- Establishing Communication with Eclipse
- Implementing Scrap, Delay, and Employee Codes in Eclipse
- Interfacing Eclipse to External Data Systems - Importing and Exporting
- Material Code Query
- Missing Snapshot or Dates for Reports in Eclipse
- Order Downloading Options in Eclipse
- Performing Eclipse Classic Automatic Backups
- Performing Eclipse Classic Manual Backups
- Preventative Maintenance Made Easy
- Replacing a Controller / Recovery from a Memory Clear
- Reporting from Archived Data
- Reporting from Archived Data
- Requesting Eclipse Support
- Sending Saved Parameters or Tool Libraries from Eclipse to XL Controller
- Using a Proxy Server
- VLINX ESR901 Converter Installation and Configuration
- Show all articles ( 10 ) Collapse Articles
-
-
- Calibrating the Backgauge - Pathfinder v2
- Calibrating the Machine - Pathfinder v2
- Calibrating the Touchscreen - Pathfinder v2
- Cleaning Controller Screens
- Extracting the Pathfinder SDF from a 5XXX/6XXX Machine
- Installing TeamViewer
- Pathfinder PC Backup/Restore/Import Procedure - Pathfinder v2
- Pathfinder PC BIOS Configuration - 5X00
- Pathfinder PC BIOS Configuration - 6X00
- Solving Memory Loss and Computer Lockup Problems
- XL250BB Backup/Restore Function
-
- FoldGuard Alignment Guide
- FoldGuard Alignment Guide - LZS-2-FG
- FoldGuard Brochure
- FoldGuard Encoder Installation Manual 1-02
- FoldGuard Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- FoldGuard Operation Manual
- FoldGuard System Installation Manual 1-06
- FoldGuard System Installation Manual 1-07
- Laser Distortion Causes and Solutions Manual 1-02
-
-
- MP300 Series Controller Manual
- MP300CL Series Controller Manual
- MP325 Manual
- MP328 Gripper Manual
- MP328CL Gripper Manual
- MP338 Backgauge Manual
- MP338DH Dual Backgauge Manual
- MP342 Manual
- MP343 Manual
- MP350PFD Manual
- MP450S Installation Guide
- MP465 Installation Guide
- MP465 Operator Manual
- MP465N Operator Manual NTM
-
-
-
- Alert: Material code NNNNNNNN does not correspond to a known material
- Checking the Status of Eclipse Pro Services
- Connect to Eclipse Pro from a Network Connected Device
- Eclipse Pro Release Notes
- Error: "Duplicate material codes. MATERIAL =..."
- Requesting Eclipse Pro Support
- Schedule Sync Table Definition
- Updating Eclipse Pro
-
-
- 4805-XX and 3805-XX Encoder Cable Comparison
- BRKT-2 Assembly STEP File
- Encoder 10-Turn Test
- Encoder Bracket BRKT-1 Dimensional Drawing
- Encoder Bracket BRKT-2 Dimensional Drawing
- Encoder Brochure
- Encoder Sell Sheet
- Encoder Splitter 6390 Electrical Block Diagram
- Encoder Splitter 6390 Sell Sheet
- Encoder Splitter 6390 Shell STEP File
- Encoder Splitter Module 6390 Guide
- Encoder Tracking and Mounting
- Encoder Wheel KMW Dimensional Drawing
- Encoder Wheel PMW Dimensional Drawing
- KMW-12 Knurled Encoder Wheel STEP File
- NXXXX Encoder Assembly STEP File
- Scrap Reduction Using Two Encoders
- Troubleshooting Encoder Alignment
- Show all articles ( 3 ) Collapse Articles
-
-
- About the MP401
- Cleaning Controller Screens
- CMP1000 Reference Manual
- CMP11-10 Reference Manual
- CMP12 Reference Manual
- MP100 Reference Manual
- MP101 Reference Manual
- MP101 v2 Reference Manual
- MP103 Reference Manual
- MP103 v3 Reference Manual
- MP237 Reference Manual
- MP257 Reference Manual
- MP37 Reference Manual
- MP38 Reference Manual
- MP39 Reference Manual
- MP401 User Manual
- MP43 Reference Manual
- MP44 Reference Manual
- MP450 Installation Guide
- MP450 Operator Manual
- MP450S Installation and Technical Reference Manual
- MP450S Installation Guide
- MP450S Operator Manual
- MP450Z Operator Manual
- MP46 Reference Manual
- MP465N Operator Manual NTM
- MP54 Reference Manual
- MP55 Reference Manual
- MP550 Operator Manual
- MP56 Reference Manual
- MP57 Reference Manual
- Show all articles ( 16 ) Collapse Articles
-